<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Portals New Rules of Engagement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.business2.com.au/2007/06/new-portals-new-rules-of-engagement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.business2.com.au/2007/06/new-portals-new-rules-of-engagement/</link>
	<description>Real Estate Agent News and Information Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 01:10:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert Simeon</title>
		<link>http://www.business2.com.au/2007/06/new-portals-new-rules-of-engagement/comment-page-1/#comment-6678</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Simeon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.business2.com.au/2007/06/14/new-portals-new-rules-of-engagement/#comment-6678</guid>
		<description>Andrew,

You are correct and thirdly, I have never before heard of PropertyNow. Thanks for bringing this to the readerships attention. Just where do you languish?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew,</p>
<p>You are correct and thirdly, I have never before heard of PropertyNow. Thanks for bringing this to the readerships attention. Just where do you languish?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: real estate</title>
		<link>http://www.business2.com.au/2007/06/new-portals-new-rules-of-engagement/comment-page-1/#comment-6676</link>
		<dc:creator>real estate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.business2.com.au/2007/06/14/new-portals-new-rules-of-engagement/#comment-6676</guid>
		<description>This is an interesting discourse when reviewed as I write this in September 2009. The two years since this initial debate has not seen many changes at all except the languishing of realestateworld and the change of ownership and direction of MyHome

Andrew Blachut
PropertyNow</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an interesting discourse when reviewed as I write this in September 2009. The two years since this initial debate has not seen many changes at all except the languishing of realestateworld and the change of ownership and direction of MyHome</p>
<p>Andrew Blachut<br />
PropertyNow</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Under the Radar</title>
		<link>http://www.business2.com.au/2007/06/new-portals-new-rules-of-engagement/comment-page-1/#comment-2786</link>
		<dc:creator>Under the Radar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 16:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.business2.com.au/2007/06/14/new-portals-new-rules-of-engagement/#comment-2786</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt; 4. Free Trials (I am sick to death of pathetic 1,2,3,4,5,6 month free trials

I don&#039;t entirely agree you have to be considered a major portal to charge for membership and offer limited trials.

One of my property portals gets just 40,000 visits per month, perhaps a tenth of what RealCommercial claim? Yet it offers a MAXIMUM 1month trial and users join happily. They don&#039;t even get locked into a minimum term membership. Our biggest problem is getting lazy agents to actually make use of their free trial in order to experience the benefit. So it wouldn&#039;t matter if the trial period was a month or a year.

Registered users pay up to $1000 per month for membership... why? Because the site gets considerably more response than any of the &#039;major&#039; portals. The fact that it ISN&#039;T a major portal actually means the audience is comprised of far more informed/serious buyers and not timewasters who just stumbled onto the site. Major portals have limitless development resources - so by &#039;doing it better&#039; yet staying under the radar of majors ensures they can&#039;t steal your concept and knock you out of the game until you&#039;re big / strong enough to go them head-on.

I think the lesson for start-up portals is: Be inovative!!! Don&#039;t do the same site RealEstate.com.au did in 1995 or you&#039;ll fail. Target a narrow segment of the property industry, service it better than the &#039;big guys&#039; THEN slowly widen your audience from here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt; 4. Free Trials (I am sick to death of pathetic 1,2,3,4,5,6 month free trials</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t entirely agree you have to be considered a major portal to charge for membership and offer limited trials.</p>
<p>One of my property portals gets just 40,000 visits per month, perhaps a tenth of what RealCommercial claim? Yet it offers a MAXIMUM 1month trial and users join happily. They don&#8217;t even get locked into a minimum term membership. Our biggest problem is getting lazy agents to actually make use of their free trial in order to experience the benefit. So it wouldn&#8217;t matter if the trial period was a month or a year.</p>
<p>Registered users pay up to $1000 per month for membership&#8230; why? Because the site gets considerably more response than any of the &#8216;major&#8217; portals. The fact that it ISN&#8217;T a major portal actually means the audience is comprised of far more informed/serious buyers and not timewasters who just stumbled onto the site. Major portals have limitless development resources &#8211; so by &#8216;doing it better&#8217; yet staying under the radar of majors ensures they can&#8217;t steal your concept and knock you out of the game until you&#8217;re big / strong enough to go them head-on.</p>
<p>I think the lesson for start-up portals is: Be inovative!!! Don&#8217;t do the same site RealEstate.com.au did in 1995 or you&#8217;ll fail. Target a narrow segment of the property industry, service it better than the &#8216;big guys&#8217; THEN slowly widen your audience from here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth</title>
		<link>http://www.business2.com.au/2007/06/new-portals-new-rules-of-engagement/comment-page-1/#comment-2785</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 09:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.business2.com.au/2007/06/14/new-portals-new-rules-of-engagement/#comment-2785</guid>
		<description>Good Evening,

Snoop I cannot see any changes to domain, well nothing in the last month. What is it that you can see.

I agree that there is a lot of space on the domain site, perhaps sometimes I feel like things could be closer together and there could be more content.

Generally, if domain are making changes to create a better website then I am all for it. None of the rules listed require anything new for my business.

Did anyone else read the article on myhome in the financial review today?

A domain spokesman said that they had written legal letters regarding myhomes claim to the &#039;number two&#039; position. It seems domain are starting to pick up their game.

E</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Evening,</p>
<p>Snoop I cannot see any changes to domain, well nothing in the last month. What is it that you can see.</p>
<p>I agree that there is a lot of space on the domain site, perhaps sometimes I feel like things could be closer together and there could be more content.</p>
<p>Generally, if domain are making changes to create a better website then I am all for it. None of the rules listed require anything new for my business.</p>
<p>Did anyone else read the article on myhome in the financial review today?</p>
<p>A domain spokesman said that they had written legal letters regarding myhomes claim to the &#8216;number two&#8217; position. It seems domain are starting to pick up their game.</p>
<p>E</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snoop</title>
		<link>http://www.business2.com.au/2007/06/new-portals-new-rules-of-engagement/comment-page-1/#comment-2784</link>
		<dc:creator>snoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 22:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.business2.com.au/2007/06/14/new-portals-new-rules-of-engagement/#comment-2784</guid>
		<description>Domain Redesign?
Just had a browse of the domain site.
Seems to have had an upgrade in terms of look and feel.
So much cleaner than Realestate.com,which just gets noisier and noisier.
What does the panel think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Domain Redesign?<br />
Just had a browse of the domain site.<br />
Seems to have had an upgrade in terms of look and feel.<br />
So much cleaner than Realestate.com,which just gets noisier and noisier.<br />
What does the panel think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth</title>
		<link>http://www.business2.com.au/2007/06/new-portals-new-rules-of-engagement/comment-page-1/#comment-2783</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 21:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.business2.com.au/2007/06/14/new-portals-new-rules-of-engagement/#comment-2783</guid>
		<description>Good morning,

There is a rumour going around that myhome has paid around $50 000 to Elders in recent days.

It is with interest that my local Elders outlet tells me their conference was earlier this year and there are no events coming up.

Which leaves me asking the question as to what this payment is all about?

If myhome are about to start paying people to advertise on the site I may well sign up.

E</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good morning,</p>
<p>There is a rumour going around that myhome has paid around $50 000 to Elders in recent days.</p>
<p>It is with interest that my local Elders outlet tells me their conference was earlier this year and there are no events coming up.</p>
<p>Which leaves me asking the question as to what this payment is all about?</p>
<p>If myhome are about to start paying people to advertise on the site I may well sign up.</p>
<p>E</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.business2.com.au/2007/06/new-portals-new-rules-of-engagement/comment-page-1/#comment-2782</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 10:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.business2.com.au/2007/06/14/new-portals-new-rules-of-engagement/#comment-2782</guid>
		<description>Read my mind Elizabeth, I do have a Dumb and Dumber Awards published each year, we have a growing list already!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read my mind Elizabeth, I do have a Dumb and Dumber Awards published each year, we have a growing list already!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth</title>
		<link>http://www.business2.com.au/2007/06/new-portals-new-rules-of-engagement/comment-page-1/#comment-2781</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 09:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.business2.com.au/2007/06/14/new-portals-new-rules-of-engagement/#comment-2781</guid>
		<description>Good Evening,

Whilst we are talking about the New Rules of Engagement for New Portals, perhaps we should be telling the existing portals what to do as well.

http://www.smh.com.au/news/web/nontechnical-glitch-shuts-down-real-estate-site/2007/06/26/1182623860210.html

It seems someone at domain forgot to pay an $83.00 bill from company with an over zealous finance department, who in turn turned off commercialrealestate.

I agree with the article that turning off the site was a harsh reaction, still, not paying a bill to keep your site up? When you are a portal?

Perhaps a new category for your site Peter, the &#039;Biggest Bloopers of 2007&#039;.

E</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Evening,</p>
<p>Whilst we are talking about the New Rules of Engagement for New Portals, perhaps we should be telling the existing portals what to do as well.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.smh.com.au/news/web/nontechnical-glitch-shuts-down-real-estate-site/2007/06/26/1182623860210.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.smh.com.au/news/web/nontechnical-glitch-shuts-down-real-estate-site/2007/06/26/1182623860210.html</a></p>
<p>It seems someone at domain forgot to pay an $83.00 bill from company with an over zealous finance department, who in turn turned off commercialrealestate.</p>
<p>I agree with the article that turning off the site was a harsh reaction, still, not paying a bill to keep your site up? When you are a portal?</p>
<p>Perhaps a new category for your site Peter, the &#8216;Biggest Bloopers of 2007&#8242;.</p>
<p>E</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snoop</title>
		<link>http://www.business2.com.au/2007/06/new-portals-new-rules-of-engagement/comment-page-1/#comment-2780</link>
		<dc:creator>snoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 21:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.business2.com.au/2007/06/14/new-portals-new-rules-of-engagement/#comment-2780</guid>
		<description>You need farly significant traffic to make money out of adsense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You need farly significant traffic to make money out of adsense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kitchen Designer</title>
		<link>http://www.business2.com.au/2007/06/new-portals-new-rules-of-engagement/comment-page-1/#comment-2779</link>
		<dc:creator>Kitchen Designer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.business2.com.au/2007/06/14/new-portals-new-rules-of-engagement/#comment-2779</guid>
		<description>I think Glenn is spot on with that last comment though I think he means implementing Adsense as a means of revenue generation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Glenn is spot on with that last comment though I think he means implementing Adsense as a means of revenue generation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
