<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Luxury Homes Australia Launches</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.business2.com.au/2008/01/luxury-homes-australia-launches/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.business2.com.au/2008/01/luxury-homes-australia-launches/</link>
	<description>Real Estate Agent News and Information Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:55:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett Clements</title>
		<link>http://www.business2.com.au/2008/01/luxury-homes-australia-launches/#comment-3352</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Clements</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.business2.com.au/2008/01/20/luxury-homes-australia-launches/#comment-3352</guid>
		<description>We were involved in the luxury site ADORE for Domain. It was, initially, to have been on all video offering but it got lost somewhere between still photographs, virtual tours and self-indulgent locality profiles that resembled more music video than area snapshots. I believe there is room for a high-end luxury home site but I agree it has have some new media differentiators.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We were involved in the luxury site ADORE for Domain. It was, initially, to have been on all video offering but it got lost somewhere between still photographs, virtual tours and self-indulgent locality profiles that resembled more music video than area snapshots. I believe there is room for a high-end luxury home site but I agree it has have some new media differentiators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Batten</title>
		<link>http://www.business2.com.au/2008/01/luxury-homes-australia-launches/#comment-3341</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Batten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.business2.com.au/2008/01/20/luxury-homes-australia-launches/#comment-3341</guid>
		<description>Snoop..

I think your missing my point. The adwords keyword tool shows search volume and  adwords competition for any keyword combination you throw at it plus it provides you with other similar keyword combinations as well. Even if your not interested in adwords you should be using this tool just for its ability to show search volume for specified keywords.  They dont actually give you numbers the numbers involved but they provide you with indicators.

People are indeed searching for those terms in quite good numbers and whilst some of them have high competition, many have not.

Finding a range of keywords with low competition would not be that hard, at least at this moment in time. Obviously that is fairly fluid thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Snoop..</p>
<p>I think your missing my point. The adwords keyword tool shows search volume and  adwords competition for any keyword combination you throw at it plus it provides you with other similar keyword combinations as well. Even if your not interested in adwords you should be using this tool just for its ability to show search volume for specified keywords.  They dont actually give you numbers the numbers involved but they provide you with indicators.</p>
<p>People are indeed searching for those terms in quite good numbers and whilst some of them have high competition, many have not.</p>
<p>Finding a range of keywords with low competition would not be that hard, at least at this moment in time. Obviously that is fairly fluid thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snoop</title>
		<link>http://www.business2.com.au/2008/01/luxury-homes-australia-launches/#comment-3340</link>
		<dc:creator>snoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 09:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.business2.com.au/2008/01/20/luxury-homes-australia-launches/#comment-3340</guid>
		<description>Question is as a consumer would I search google for luxury homes?
Rob simeon in mosman might shed some light on what his customers search for??
Waterfront ,Jetty,helipad,jaccuzi,staff and nanny accom combos?
Interesting?
I wonder if the keyword bids are low ,are people searching?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question is as a consumer would I search google for luxury homes?<br />
Rob simeon in mosman might shed some light on what his customers search for??<br />
Waterfront ,Jetty,helipad,jaccuzi,staff and nanny accom combos?<br />
Interesting?<br />
I wonder if the keyword bids are low ,are people searching?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Batten</title>
		<link>http://www.business2.com.au/2008/01/luxury-homes-australia-launches/#comment-3351</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Batten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 00:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.business2.com.au/2008/01/20/luxury-homes-australia-launches/#comment-3351</guid>
		<description>Ralph...

The niche for this site is Luxury.. so a check of the google adwords keywords tool finds a large number of luxury based keywords with good quality traffic but with very little to no competition. Very little competition means they dont have to pay a fortune for each visitor.

As an example &quot;Luxury Homes Sydney&quot;, &quot;Luxury Homes Rent&quot; and &quot;Luxury Beachfront Homes&quot; have good traffic but no competition but a search would find dozens if not hundreds of other keywords that will work with them.

My issue is that they don&#039;t seem to be offering anything different from the competition except LESS property.  This will mean that they will pay good money to attract visitors that will not stay long and will not return...  which is exactly what happened to Myhome.

They should try and be innovators in the Niche. They dont have to have the most million dollar homes but they have to have the best experience if they want to survive.

Virtually all luxury homes buyers will have broadband and just about all luxury homes will have professional shots so why not have high res photos available so they fill the screen not small  800pix photos.

The could do full screen slideshows such as this (maximise your browser before clicking) http://glennbatten.smugmug.com/photos/sspopup.mg?AlbumID=1578729

Overlay their logo and web address on each photo. Photos of presitge homes are likely to be downloaded and be passed around  and used as screen savers so make sure their logo and web address is on each photo.

Once the site gains enough momentum they might be able to dump the adword campaign.

That would be where I would start anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ralph&#8230;</p>
<p>The niche for this site is Luxury.. so a check of the google adwords keywords tool finds a large number of luxury based keywords with good quality traffic but with very little to no competition. Very little competition means they dont have to pay a fortune for each visitor.</p>
<p>As an example &#8220;Luxury Homes Sydney&#8221;, &#8220;Luxury Homes Rent&#8221; and &#8220;Luxury Beachfront Homes&#8221; have good traffic but no competition but a search would find dozens if not hundreds of other keywords that will work with them.</p>
<p>My issue is that they don&#8217;t seem to be offering anything different from the competition except LESS property.  This will mean that they will pay good money to attract visitors that will not stay long and will not return&#8230;  which is exactly what happened to Myhome.</p>
<p>They should try and be innovators in the Niche. They dont have to have the most million dollar homes but they have to have the best experience if they want to survive.</p>
<p>Virtually all luxury homes buyers will have broadband and just about all luxury homes will have professional shots so why not have high res photos available so they fill the screen not small  800pix photos.</p>
<p>The could do full screen slideshows such as this (maximise your browser before clicking) <a href="http://glennbatten.smugmug.com/photos/sspopup.mg?AlbumID=1578729" rel="nofollow">http://glennbatten.smugmug.com/photos/sspopup.mg?AlbumID=1578729</a></p>
<p>Overlay their logo and web address on each photo. Photos of presitge homes are likely to be downloaded and be passed around  and used as screen savers so make sure their logo and web address is on each photo.</p>
<p>Once the site gains enough momentum they might be able to dump the adword campaign.</p>
<p>That would be where I would start anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Ricci</title>
		<link>http://www.business2.com.au/2008/01/luxury-homes-australia-launches/#comment-3350</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Ricci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.business2.com.au/2008/01/20/luxury-homes-australia-launches/#comment-3350</guid>
		<description>Hi Glenn, I called them about this as it was in their PDF brochure about hits as well. I was sure they would get this right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Glenn, I called them about this as it was in their PDF brochure about hits as well. I was sure they would get this right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Batten</title>
		<link>http://www.business2.com.au/2008/01/luxury-homes-australia-launches/#comment-3349</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Batten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.business2.com.au/2008/01/20/luxury-homes-australia-launches/#comment-3349</guid>
		<description>I just got an email from these guys sprouting HITS.

It has been a long time since anybody used hits as a measure of a websites performance.

I think if they want agents to take their statistics seriously  they should provide unique browser figures in line with the other portals.  The only problem with this of course is that UB&#039;s may be very unimpressive unlike the using 297,000 hits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got an email from these guys sprouting HITS.</p>
<p>It has been a long time since anybody used hits as a measure of a websites performance.</p>
<p>I think if they want agents to take their statistics seriously  they should provide unique browser figures in line with the other portals.  The only problem with this of course is that UB&#8217;s may be very unimpressive unlike the using 297,000 hits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph W.</title>
		<link>http://www.business2.com.au/2008/01/luxury-homes-australia-launches/#comment-3337</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 07:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.business2.com.au/2008/01/20/luxury-homes-australia-launches/#comment-3337</guid>
		<description>&#039;The success of this will depend on their systems and of course how popular the site will be over time, clever budgeting of marketing $ will be needed if this is to gain any traction as independents rarely have the big marketing $$$.&#039;

Anyone have any constructive ideas on what would be the most effective marketing strategy for an independent/ small agency site like this one?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;The success of this will depend on their systems and of course how popular the site will be over time, clever budgeting of marketing $ will be needed if this is to gain any traction as independents rarely have the big marketing $$$.&#8217;</p>
<p>Anyone have any constructive ideas on what would be the most effective marketing strategy for an independent/ small agency site like this one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Simeon</title>
		<link>http://www.business2.com.au/2008/01/luxury-homes-australia-launches/#comment-3336</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Simeon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 00:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.business2.com.au/2008/01/20/luxury-homes-australia-launches/#comment-3336</guid>
		<description>Interesting yet well rehearsed with other portals although somehow (with respect) luxury and $1,000,000 are no longer in unison with the majority of property niche markets.

A this point of time it would appear that some agents wanting to get a piece of the top-end markets could use this portal as a listing tool. However, at the end of the day we all know that vendors require much more than that. Still provides some revenue streams to the owners which ever so slowly will attempt to re-coup costs. Although I must admit a tough ask as it identifies very little points of difference from it&#039;s more logical competitors.

The next step following a launch is the much more difficult test of time where previously many have stood before and now cease to exist. At this point in time from our perspective it is a lukewarm response. I believe it simply struggles to re-inforce that it dares to be different and offers consumers that fuzzy feeling.

Way too much of the old with very little of the new.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting yet well rehearsed with other portals although somehow (with respect) luxury and $1,000,000 are no longer in unison with the majority of property niche markets.</p>
<p>A this point of time it would appear that some agents wanting to get a piece of the top-end markets could use this portal as a listing tool. However, at the end of the day we all know that vendors require much more than that. Still provides some revenue streams to the owners which ever so slowly will attempt to re-coup costs. Although I must admit a tough ask as it identifies very little points of difference from it&#8217;s more logical competitors.</p>
<p>The next step following a launch is the much more difficult test of time where previously many have stood before and now cease to exist. At this point in time from our perspective it is a lukewarm response. I believe it simply struggles to re-inforce that it dares to be different and offers consumers that fuzzy feeling.</p>
<p>Way too much of the old with very little of the new.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaulD</title>
		<link>http://www.business2.com.au/2008/01/luxury-homes-australia-launches/#comment-3339</link>
		<dc:creator>PaulD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 00:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.business2.com.au/2008/01/20/luxury-homes-australia-launches/#comment-3339</guid>
		<description>New websites:   I just got a card (in the mail) from a brave new internet site called   realestateonly.com.au   They will have a long row to hoe.  Currently there is one listing in NSW (that I could find) and 19 in Victoria.  It must be a Victorian site because it has 19 times as many properties as NSW, or to put it another way, NSW only has 5% as many properties on that site as Victoria does.  It doesn&#039;t have any listings in either SA or Qld.  so we can&#039;t say how many more gazillion times people are more likely to see properties on this website in Victoria that they are in either SA or Qld.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New websites:   I just got a card (in the mail) from a brave new internet site called   realestateonly.com.au   They will have a long row to hoe.  Currently there is one listing in NSW (that I could find) and 19 in Victoria.  It must be a Victorian site because it has 19 times as many properties as NSW, or to put it another way, NSW only has 5% as many properties on that site as Victoria does.  It doesn&#8217;t have any listings in either SA or Qld.  so we can&#8217;t say how many more gazillion times people are more likely to see properties on this website in Victoria that they are in either SA or Qld.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://www.business2.com.au/2008/01/luxury-homes-australia-launches/#comment-3338</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 00:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.business2.com.au/2008/01/20/luxury-homes-australia-launches/#comment-3338</guid>
		<description>*yawn*

LuxuryRealEsate.com (US based) opened up back in 2004 here in Australia, now have 30+ agents and more than 480 listings. One site in this niche is enough.
http://www.luxuryrealestate.com/australia/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*yawn*</p>
<p>LuxuryRealEsate.com (US based) opened up back in 2004 here in Australia, now have 30+ agents and more than 480 listings. One site in this niche is enough.<br />
<a href="http://www.luxuryrealestate.com/australia/" rel="nofollow">http://www.luxuryrealestate.com/australia/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

