<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Here&#8217;s one way real estate agents can control the web&#8217;s future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.business2.com.au/2008/02/heres-one-way-real-estate-agents-can-control-the-webs-future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.business2.com.au/2008/02/heres-one-way-real-estate-agents-can-control-the-webs-future/</link>
	<description>Real Estate Agent News and Information Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 23:58:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://www.business2.com.au/2008/02/heres-one-way-real-estate-agents-can-control-the-webs-future/comment-page-1/#comment-3499</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 12:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.business2.com.au/2008/02/21/heres-one-way-real-estate-agents-can-control-the-webs-future/#comment-3499</guid>
		<description>I think it would be a great thing, I was appaled with my last agent and it would have been great to find out what other people thought of him first.

The website that I run allows people to leave reviews and ratings for apartment buildings, so I&#039;m definitely for this type of thing.

Question is, who&#039;s going to be the one to release such a site?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it would be a great thing, I was appaled with my last agent and it would have been great to find out what other people thought of him first.</p>
<p>The website that I run allows people to leave reviews and ratings for apartment buildings, so I&#8217;m definitely for this type of thing.</p>
<p>Question is, who&#8217;s going to be the one to release such a site?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Simeon</title>
		<link>http://www.business2.com.au/2008/02/heres-one-way-real-estate-agents-can-control-the-webs-future/comment-page-1/#comment-3500</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Simeon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 00:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.business2.com.au/2008/02/21/heres-one-way-real-estate-agents-can-control-the-webs-future/#comment-3500</guid>
		<description>Just when are your number of sales and years of experience *NOT* an itegral component of an agents track record?

Obviously a new definition of track record is headed our way from America! Just as interesting is that the real estate models that Australian real estate agencies copied from America ie Remax have been a distinct failure which further explains why agencies are dismantling these useless concepts of agents buying desks in an agency and then &quot;pay the owner to stay&quot;.

Little wonder the monkeys were climbing the climbing the walls throwing peanuts at anyone who came in sight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just when are your number of sales and years of experience *NOT* an itegral component of an agents track record?</p>
<p>Obviously a new definition of track record is headed our way from America! Just as interesting is that the real estate models that Australian real estate agencies copied from America ie Remax have been a distinct failure which further explains why agencies are dismantling these useless concepts of agents buying desks in an agency and then &#8220;pay the owner to stay&#8221;.</p>
<p>Little wonder the monkeys were climbing the climbing the walls throwing peanuts at anyone who came in sight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.business2.com.au/2008/02/heres-one-way-real-estate-agents-can-control-the-webs-future/comment-page-1/#comment-3501</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.business2.com.au/2008/02/21/heres-one-way-real-estate-agents-can-control-the-webs-future/#comment-3501</guid>
		<description>Check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.agentgrade.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;agentgrade.org&lt;/a&gt;.  Here&#039;s a place where at least some agents are getting the idea that buyers want more to go on than just your sales numbers or your years in the business.  They want to know about your track record!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out <a href="http://www.agentgrade.org" rel="nofollow">agentgrade.org</a>.  Here&#8217;s a place where at least some agents are getting the idea that buyers want more to go on than just your sales numbers or your years in the business.  They want to know about your track record!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.business2.com.au/2008/02/heres-one-way-real-estate-agents-can-control-the-webs-future/comment-page-1/#comment-3502</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 15:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.business2.com.au/2008/02/21/heres-one-way-real-estate-agents-can-control-the-webs-future/#comment-3502</guid>
		<description>Apologies for posting on a &quot;stale&quot; blog - I notice the last post on this was nearly a month ago.

I am not a real estate agent, but have on several occassions had to face the deliberation on which agent to choose to sell my property. In all I&#039;ve had to make that decision 4 times so far.

How much were those decisions worth to me?
1)Commission: Lets say 2.5% commission on 4 properties of average value of $500k in todays $ - that&#039;s $50k.
2)Price realised on sale: lets assume the difference in price realised by a great agent over a crap one is say 10% of the property value - ie a good agent might achieve $550, a bad one $500k for the same property.  So thats 10% of 4 properties at $500k = another $200k.

So all up these decisions have been worth about $250k to me. More than likely the most significant $ decisions I will make in my life.

So what information did I have to inform these decisions worth $250k? 1)Market share:Which agent appears to have the most properties for sale. 2)Pretty advertisements:  who&#039;s advertisements/property magazines look the best, 3) Personality of individual agent :Which agent came across as a decent and capable guy 4) References from friends / family, 5) Commission: who is asking the lowest commission.

Not much to work with for such a major decision huh?

What a I getting at here? Well I guess what I am saying is I think agents should spend a bit more time putting yourselves in the shoes of your customers for a moment. They need to make the biggest financial decision of their lives and they have very very little real data to go on..

1) to 3) are very flaky reasons to choose one agent over another.
4) is fine if you actually know anyone who has used a particular agent before. Problem is that unless you really trust this person their opinion ain&#039;t worth much anyway. (Hmm...Now if there were 20 strangers telling me the same thing...!)

5) is where I suspect many of you end up in your negotiations with potential customers - mainly because its the only tangible info you can use to make a decision on.

Bottom line is vendor&#039;s need more tangible info to use in the decision making. Given the alternative of 5) above - (capable) agents should be embracing this because it means more $.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apologies for posting on a &#8220;stale&#8221; blog &#8211; I notice the last post on this was nearly a month ago.</p>
<p>I am not a real estate agent, but have on several occassions had to face the deliberation on which agent to choose to sell my property. In all I&#8217;ve had to make that decision 4 times so far.</p>
<p>How much were those decisions worth to me?<br />
1)Commission: Lets say 2.5% commission on 4 properties of average value of $500k in todays $ &#8211; that&#8217;s $50k.<br />
2)Price realised on sale: lets assume the difference in price realised by a great agent over a crap one is say 10% of the property value &#8211; ie a good agent might achieve $550, a bad one $500k for the same property.  So thats 10% of 4 properties at $500k = another $200k.</p>
<p>So all up these decisions have been worth about $250k to me. More than likely the most significant $ decisions I will make in my life.</p>
<p>So what information did I have to inform these decisions worth $250k? 1)Market share:Which agent appears to have the most properties for sale. 2)Pretty advertisements:  who&#8217;s advertisements/property magazines look the best, 3) Personality of individual agent :Which agent came across as a decent and capable guy 4) References from friends / family, 5) Commission: who is asking the lowest commission.</p>
<p>Not much to work with for such a major decision huh?</p>
<p>What a I getting at here? Well I guess what I am saying is I think agents should spend a bit more time putting yourselves in the shoes of your customers for a moment. They need to make the biggest financial decision of their lives and they have very very little real data to go on..</p>
<p>1) to 3) are very flaky reasons to choose one agent over another.<br />
4) is fine if you actually know anyone who has used a particular agent before. Problem is that unless you really trust this person their opinion ain&#8217;t worth much anyway. (Hmm&#8230;Now if there were 20 strangers telling me the same thing&#8230;!)</p>
<p>5) is where I suspect many of you end up in your negotiations with potential customers &#8211; mainly because its the only tangible info you can use to make a decision on.</p>
<p>Bottom line is vendor&#8217;s need more tangible info to use in the decision making. Given the alternative of 5) above &#8211; (capable) agents should be embracing this because it means more $.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Platter</title>
		<link>http://www.business2.com.au/2008/02/heres-one-way-real-estate-agents-can-control-the-webs-future/comment-page-1/#comment-3496</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Platter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 06:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.business2.com.au/2008/02/21/heres-one-way-real-estate-agents-can-control-the-webs-future/#comment-3496</guid>
		<description>Greg, I can&#039;t lay my fingers on the data, but I recall being told that the agents who put less information and fewer photos up tend to get more phone calls/emails asking about very basic listing information. This doesn&#039;t translate into more leads, because they spend a lot of time dealing with people who would have had no interest in the property if they had had more info about it from the beginning.

Also, realestate.com.au&#039;s consumer survey found that the most important deciding factor for consumers (58%) is professionalism. Little sly tricks like that would certainly undermine one&#039;s professional image, and one would imagine it would lead to fewer referrals and fewer walk-in clients.

The full list of the top 5 factors affecting vendors&#039; choice of estate agents are:
Professionalism 58%
Local market knowledge 48%
Percentage commission charged 41%
Presentation 39%
Responsiveness 39%

Source: realestate.com.au Quarterly Property Consumer Insights Report (Sept. 2007).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg, I can&#8217;t lay my fingers on the data, but I recall being told that the agents who put less information and fewer photos up tend to get more phone calls/emails asking about very basic listing information. This doesn&#8217;t translate into more leads, because they spend a lot of time dealing with people who would have had no interest in the property if they had had more info about it from the beginning.</p>
<p>Also, realestate.com.au&#8217;s consumer survey found that the most important deciding factor for consumers (58%) is professionalism. Little sly tricks like that would certainly undermine one&#8217;s professional image, and one would imagine it would lead to fewer referrals and fewer walk-in clients.</p>
<p>The full list of the top 5 factors affecting vendors&#8217; choice of estate agents are:<br />
Professionalism 58%<br />
Local market knowledge 48%<br />
Percentage commission charged 41%<br />
Presentation 39%<br />
Responsiveness 39%</p>
<p>Source: realestate.com.au Quarterly Property Consumer Insights Report (Sept. 2007).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Vincent</title>
		<link>http://www.business2.com.au/2008/02/heres-one-way-real-estate-agents-can-control-the-webs-future/comment-page-1/#comment-3497</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Vincent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 05:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.business2.com.au/2008/02/21/heres-one-way-real-estate-agents-can-control-the-webs-future/#comment-3497</guid>
		<description>Peter there are many agents who have the idea that when marketing over the internet less is more. Some feel that by not providing much property information over the internet encourages the buyers to call &amp; ask questions.

Does anyone know of any stats to support which way actually works best?

BTW I&#039;m amazed at how many listings come through my client alert without any photos attached as agents rush to get the listing uploaded. Great first impression for buyers &amp; potential sellers. Not!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter there are many agents who have the idea that when marketing over the internet less is more. Some feel that by not providing much property information over the internet encourages the buyers to call &amp; ask questions.</p>
<p>Does anyone know of any stats to support which way actually works best?</p>
<p>BTW I&#8217;m amazed at how many listings come through my client alert without any photos attached as agents rush to get the listing uploaded. Great first impression for buyers &amp; potential sellers. Not!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Ricci</title>
		<link>http://www.business2.com.au/2008/02/heres-one-way-real-estate-agents-can-control-the-webs-future/comment-page-1/#comment-3498</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Ricci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 04:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.business2.com.au/2008/02/21/heres-one-way-real-estate-agents-can-control-the-webs-future/#comment-3498</guid>
		<description>I think REA and Domain should rethink the whole pay extra and get higher mentality. I know that this will not happen.....

So. How about having listings appear below these results by how much information is provided. More pictures, land size, building size etc the higher they appear in results.

This will have a two fold effect. 1. Vendors will place pressure on agents because their listings are not appearing and 2. Agents will compete on quality and quantity of information provided.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think REA and Domain should rethink the whole pay extra and get higher mentality. I know that this will not happen&#8230;..</p>
<p>So. How about having listings appear below these results by how much information is provided. More pictures, land size, building size etc the higher they appear in results.</p>
<p>This will have a two fold effect. 1. Vendors will place pressure on agents because their listings are not appearing and 2. Agents will compete on quality and quantity of information provided.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Traditional agents will be replaced? &#124; Business2 Real Estate Agent News and Information Technology</title>
		<link>http://www.business2.com.au/2008/02/heres-one-way-real-estate-agents-can-control-the-webs-future/comment-page-1/#comment-3495</link>
		<dc:creator>Traditional agents will be replaced? &#124; Business2 Real Estate Agent News and Information Technology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 03:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.business2.com.au/2008/02/21/heres-one-way-real-estate-agents-can-control-the-webs-future/#comment-3495</guid>
		<description>[...] Peter Williams&#8217; entire presentation the other day, there is one line that I can still quote from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Peter Williams&#8217; entire presentation the other day, there is one line that I can still quote from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louisville Real Estate</title>
		<link>http://www.business2.com.au/2008/02/heres-one-way-real-estate-agents-can-control-the-webs-future/comment-page-1/#comment-3480</link>
		<dc:creator>Louisville Real Estate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 01:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.business2.com.au/2008/02/21/heres-one-way-real-estate-agents-can-control-the-webs-future/#comment-3480</guid>
		<description>Wow Dave, I&#039;m amazed that you actually calculated that all out. Way to go and thanks for the info! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow Dave, I&#8217;m amazed that you actually calculated that all out. Way to go and thanks for the info! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Platter</title>
		<link>http://www.business2.com.au/2008/02/heres-one-way-real-estate-agents-can-control-the-webs-future/comment-page-1/#comment-3481</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Platter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 20:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.business2.com.au/2008/02/21/heres-one-way-real-estate-agents-can-control-the-webs-future/#comment-3481</guid>
		<description>Glenn, you are so right. Industry support for any ranking initiative, by whoever executes it, would depend on how it is done.

Regarding the 2 of 3 minutes, you are also right that the source is Nielsen//NetRatings Market Intelligence. Technically, according to my Excel calculation, 1.983824019 of every 3 minutes spent looking at a NNR-tracked real estate website in Dec. 2007 was spent on realestate.com.au.

Have a great Sunday everybody.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glenn, you are so right. Industry support for any ranking initiative, by whoever executes it, would depend on how it is done.</p>
<p>Regarding the 2 of 3 minutes, you are also right that the source is Nielsen//NetRatings Market Intelligence. Technically, according to my Excel calculation, 1.983824019 of every 3 minutes spent looking at a NNR-tracked real estate website in Dec. 2007 was spent on realestate.com.au.</p>
<p>Have a great Sunday everybody.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
